Exabis Library

To address the question if pediatric CD patients responding to nutritional induction therapy can be maintained in remission on dietary therapy without the use of immunosuppressive drugs, we designed a prospective randomized trial (CD-HOPE) comparing cyclic exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) to daily supplement over a 12 month period.

CD patients (6-17 years) who successfully completed at least 6 weeks of EEN with clinical remission (wPCDAI ≤12.5) were recruited in 21 sites of the French GETAID pédiatrique between 12.2014 and 09.2018. All drug therapy had to be stopped at least 4 weeks prior to inclusion. A total of 112 patients were screened with 100 patients randomized to group A cyclic EEN (100% of caloric requirement) every 8 weeks for 2 weeks or group B daily supplementary nutrition (25% of caloric requirement). Patient stratification according to age (< 10 years or older) and previous drug exposure or not. EEN and the nutritional supplement were in form of MODULEN IBD®. Except for the two weeks of EEN in group A food access was not restricted. Primary objective was the comparison of relapse rates at 12 months (defined as a wPCDAI >12.5 at two consecutive visits) between the two groups (log-rank test per protocol). Additional analyses were performed using a multivariate regression analysis and cox model.

49 CD patients were randomized to group A (cyclic EEN) and 51 to group B (daily supplement) with 43/49 and 44/51 newly diagnosed patients without any previous drug exposure. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Median age was 12 and 13 years, group A and B respectively. At the final 12 months visits a total of 25/49 patients (group A) remained in remission without disease activation compared to 12/51 patients (group B) (p=0.004) with a hazard ratio of 0.48 (0.29-0.80) (p= 0.0051). Kaplan Maier survival remission rates are shown in figure 1. Mean fecal calprotectine levels showed no significant difference between the two groups (297, 399 and 469 at month 0, 3, and 12 visits in group A and 480, 606, and 283 at month 0,3, and 12 visits in group B). Mucosal healing at M12 months was achieved in 25/49 patients (group A) and 18/51 patients (group B), with a mucosal healing rate of 52%  (group A) and 33% (group B). Both treatment arms showed a significant catch-up growth.

This is first trial indicating that children/adolescents with CD responding to EEN as induction therapy can be maintained on remission with a nutritional therapy without immunosuppressors/biologics. However, daily nutritional supplement with normal access to food was not successful with a relapse rate of 76%.
This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Nestlé Health Science and sponsored by APHP.

Isolated colonic (L2) Crohn’s disease (CD) in adults is thought to have unique clinical and genetic features compared with ileal (L1) CD and ulcerative colitis (UC). Similar studies in paediatrics are scarce. Our goal was to characterize the clinical features of paediatric patients with isolated colonic CD and compare them to patients with ileo-cecal CD and those with UC.

This was a multi-center retrospective study including 21 sites affiliated with the Porto IBD group and IBD interest group of ESPGHAN. Data of paediatric patients diagnosed between 2014-2017 with L1 or L2 CD, or with UC, was collected, including information on demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters at diagnosis, end of induction, 1 year and 3 years after diagnosis (or at last follow-up).

Data was collected on 300 children (102 L1, 94 L2, 104 UC) with similar demographic features. At diagnosis, bloody stools were identified in 45% of L2 patients, compared with 15% and 95% of L1 and UC patients, respectively (P<0.001), while fever was documented in 27% of L2 patients, compared to 13% and 3% of L1 and UC patients, respectively (P<0.001). At the time of diagnosis, the median pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index for patients with L1 and L2 was 25 (IQR 17.5-37) and 27.5 (20-40), respectively, while the median pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index was 40 (30-55) for patients with UC. C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher among CD patients (both L1 and L2), compared to patients with UC, and calprotectin values were comparable. ASCA was positive in 55%, 25% and 2% (P<0.001) and pANCA in 2%, 17% and 53% (P<0.001) in L1, L2 and UC patients, respectively. Granulomas were identified in 36% of L2 patients, similar to patients with L1 (33%). For induction therapy, exclusive enteral nutrition, oral steroids and mesalazine were used in 50%, 45% and 38% of patients with L2 CD, compared with 72%, 28% and 9%, and 0%, 52% and 75% of L1 and UC patients, respectively (P<0.001). Steroid-free clinical remission at the end of induction was overall similar between groups, around 55%. At 1-year post-diagnosis, 62%, 68% and 40% were on an immunomodulator (P=0.03) and 41%, 26% and 22% were receiving anti-TNFα agent (P=0.01), of patients with L1, L2 and UC, respectively. While time to initiation of an anti-TNFα agent was significantly shorter in L1 patients compared with L2 and UC (P=0.03), time to admission and time to surgery were similar.

Paediatric patients with isolated colonic CD exhibit several clinical features which differentiate them from ileo-cecal CD and UC. Prospective studies are required to understand the pathogenesis of this unique entity and define short- and long-term outcomes.